darkemeralds: Photo of Downtown Portland, Oregon USA in twilight (Portland)
darkemeralds ([personal profile] darkemeralds) wrote2011-12-18 11:43 am

Grimm

I almost blush to admit that I'm enjoying "Grimm", but I'll cop to it (ha ha): a strong parochialism makes me feel I should give second, third, and fourth chances to a show that's not only filmed here in my little town, but set here--which is to say that, unlike Leverage, Grimm goes out of its way to find specifically Portlandy locations, rather than generic city-and-river shots that might, if you squint, pass for Boston.

(Though I hear that Leverage is moving its storyline to Portland next season, so aren't we just the flavor of the month!)

The concept--a special class of humans known as Grimms who can perceive (and presumably do battle with) other special classes of folk who can pass as human but who are the stuff of fairy tales--is pretty fresh, and the actors are solid. The show is shot in some lovely gloomy-light conditions, and the production design is heavy on wood-paneled interiors and rich colors, a nice Portland-meets-Bavaria kind of look that I find appealing. The special effects--human-to-creature-face, swarms of untrainable critters like rats and bees, really gruesome dead bodies--are very good.

What's weird is the writing. The stories are...well, okay. Not bad. There are some great action moments. The overarching storyline is intriguing, with secrets, lies, and backstories aplenty--will Nick's wife find out that he's a Grimm? How long will it take for Angel Monroe to give in to his true nature and start drinking human blood wilding in the woods tearing off people's limbs? Stuff like that. Every episode is leavened with comedy, some of it (like the pig-man coming up out of his mud bath) very funny.

But the dialog. Dear god. It's as if they have two writer's rooms, where the old hands write the stories, then turn them over to the high school interns to put actual words into the characters' mouths. I honestly don't know how the actors manage, but bless 'em, they do their best.

I'll probably keep watching because, besides the hometown connection, Grimm strikes me as having a lot of potential if NBC gives it a chance. Besides, David Giuntoli, the lead, is the next best thing to Sean Maher runnin' around Portland, and that makes me smile.
jumpuphigh: Pigeon with text "jumpuphigh" (Default)

[personal profile] jumpuphigh 2011-12-19 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
Oooh. Thanks for the review. It's been on my "should I try it?" list for a few weeks now.
jumpuphigh: Pigeon with text "jumpuphigh" (Default)

[personal profile] jumpuphigh 2011-12-19 07:37 am (UTC)(link)
I'll keep it on my maybe list a while longer. I'm currently not in need of any more shows but perhaps during one of the down periods, I'll watch a few episodes and check it out. One of the leads was on Craig Ferguson and she amused me so that alone is enough for me to give it a chance.

[personal profile] silk_knickers 2011-12-19 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
Your review is spot-on. I've been watching it too, wishing all along that I liked it more than I do. There's so much potential there, but it isn't quite clicking yet. I liked the Pied Piper one and the the Three Little Pigs riff, though, so maybe its starting to find its feet.
donutsweeper: (Default)

[personal profile] donutsweeper 2011-12-19 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
I've been watching Grimm too, and am rather on the fence about it. It's horribly wooden in places and other bits make no sense, but there's some great parts too... I don't know. For now I'll keep watching it, but I wouldn't be heartbroken if it were canceled either.
sara: a grim Northwestern scene (orygun)

[personal profile] sara 2011-12-19 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
I watched bits of it over C's shoulder earlier this week and basically by the end we'd both decided that if we want to see bits of Oregon on television we get more out of "Oregon Field Guide."
sara: *snerk* (*snerk*)

[personal profile] sara 2011-12-19 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, for that you want Art Beat.
lyr: (Default)

[personal profile] lyr 2011-12-19 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
I'm quite enjoying Grimm myself. I've always been a sucker for serious takes on fairy tales. I really like it in contrast with the way things were going on SPN, actually; it's good to have a paranormal show that doesn't make me flinch. I like that the answer is not always to kill the non-humans, and that Nick tries deadly force as his last resort. I like that things are usually more complicated than humans=good, not humans=bad. And, of course, I like that I don't immediately know when I see a character of color that I have spotted this week's villain.
ravurian: (insufferable british snob)

[personal profile] ravurian 2011-12-19 10:08 am (UTC)(link)
So I should give it another chance? I watched the first couple of episodes and then let it slide, though I don't rightly remember why. I think I was already irked by the 'there can be only one (in every eligible family)' idea; and by the fact that heritability goes with seniority in that family (so what if they have a really large and long-lived family? You get an succession of alzheimers-ridden seniors freaking out in nursing homes?) and not in a direct line of descent from parent to child; and then I was irked that the fairy tale creatures - of whom there doesn't seem to be a shortage - didn't just gang together and wipe them out (by which I mean, massacre them, overwhelm them with sheer numbers, rip them apart, and not, for example, enter into long-winded and Machiavellian conspiracies involving becoming their boss). And then I realised that I was trying to work out the logic of the story and was irked at myself. But! I will give the show another shot, because I can occasionally turn off my internal monologue, and I am not always grumpy at everything all of the time, and I trust your instincts :).

I did quite like 'Once Upon A Time', and that's utter tosh, too. Although, I'm many, many episodes behind on that one...
ravurian: (hugh dancy)

[personal profile] ravurian 2011-12-20 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
The thing is, they're all solvable issues, and they don't necessarily need to be resolved so soon in a series, but I do look for indications that the writers are aware of them and may take steps to address them. In, for example, The Fades, I spent much of the second episode with a steadily deepening frown only to find that in the third episode the writers had not only considered most of the things that had made me squint at the TV, but were ready to address them. Not only that, they had extrapolated further and gone deeper, so that answering those questions didn't conclude things entirely, but instead led to more story. I like it when that happens: it feels like a conversation rather than a monologue, like I am being invited to engage with it.

I don't think that this is a failure of perception on your part; not in the slightest. Rather, it's an indication of optimism, which I sort of envy. I'm a critical bugger, lol.
ravurian: (james mcavoy aah)

[personal profile] ravurian 2011-12-19 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL! I was just about to comment to say you didn't give me a yes or no! [personal profile] ruric tells me that it gets better, too, so, on the basis that two out of three of us think it's worth watching more, I shall! Problem solved! :D
ruric: (Default)

[personal profile] ruric 2011-12-20 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I'm quite enjoying Grimm - though yeah - terrifically uneven.

But I am enjoying the Portland locations and the craftsmen houses are lovely *G*

Chris Downey, IIRC, confirmed at Con1 that they will be using Portland as the home base for the Leverage team for next year instead of making it pretend to be Boston. I hope it means we get to see more, as you say, Portland-y locations.

despina_moon: (Cthulhu)

[personal profile] despina_moon 2011-12-20 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
Ha! I just started watching it -- a couple of friends really liked it and encouraged me to watch. And I'm hopelessly hooked. It's rough and I'm not loving the acting -- but I'm hopeful the actors will gel before it gets the heave-ho.
writerscramp: (if it weren't for my horse)

[personal profile] writerscramp 2011-12-20 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee, I had to laugh at your sheepish confession, if only because we're enjoying it, as well, and for the same reasons. Were it not set in Portland, I probably would've dropped it off my list after the first or second episode, but the fact that they really embrace the setting has been enough to make up for its other mediocrities.

It is kind of odd how uneven the writing is. And the acting, frankly. The acting isn't bad, exactly, but I think the lead is stiff (not helped by the dialogue, as you point out) and with the exception of the werewolf guy (well, and occasionally the lead's cop partner), the characters aren't very compelling.

That said, it's fun and fluffy and somewhat entertaining (as long as you check your brain at the door), with some real potential if thing coalesce a little more. And it seems to be doing well enough -- I read not too long ago that it's NBC's #1 new show and regularly beats Fringe (which is unfortunate, since I really like Fringe and would like to see it get another season). They must have some confidence in it since they granted them a full season fairly early on and they tested it out on Thursday night a couple of weeks ago.
tehomet: (Default)

[personal profile] tehomet 2011-12-28 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the review. I must give it a try.