![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I almost blush to admit that I'm enjoying "Grimm", but I'll cop to it (ha ha): a strong parochialism makes me feel I should give second, third, and fourth chances to a show that's not only filmed here in my little town, but set here--which is to say that, unlike Leverage, Grimm goes out of its way to find specifically Portlandy locations, rather than generic city-and-river shots that might, if you squint, pass for Boston.
(Though I hear that Leverage is moving its storyline to Portland next season, so aren't we just the flavor of the month!)
The concept--a special class of humans known as Grimms who can perceive (and presumably do battle with) other special classes of folk who can pass as human but who are the stuff of fairy tales--is pretty fresh, and the actors are solid. The show is shot in some lovely gloomy-light conditions, and the production design is heavy on wood-paneled interiors and rich colors, a nice Portland-meets-Bavaria kind of look that I find appealing. The special effects--human-to-creature-face, swarms of untrainable critters like rats and bees, really gruesome dead bodies--are very good.
What's weird is the writing. The stories are...well, okay. Not bad. There are some great action moments. The overarching storyline is intriguing, with secrets, lies, and backstories aplenty--will Nick's wife find out that he's a Grimm? How long will it take forAngel Monroe to give in to his true nature and start drinking human blood wilding in the woods tearing off people's limbs? Stuff like that. Every episode is leavened with comedy, some of it (like the pig-man coming up out of his mud bath) very funny.
But the dialog. Dear god. It's as if they have two writer's rooms, where the old hands write the stories, then turn them over to the high school interns to put actual words into the characters' mouths. I honestly don't know how the actors manage, but bless 'em, they do their best.
I'll probably keep watching because, besides the hometown connection, Grimm strikes me as having a lot of potential if NBC gives it a chance. Besides, David Giuntoli, the lead, is the next best thing to Sean Maher runnin' around Portland, and that makes me smile.
(Though I hear that Leverage is moving its storyline to Portland next season, so aren't we just the flavor of the month!)
The concept--a special class of humans known as Grimms who can perceive (and presumably do battle with) other special classes of folk who can pass as human but who are the stuff of fairy tales--is pretty fresh, and the actors are solid. The show is shot in some lovely gloomy-light conditions, and the production design is heavy on wood-paneled interiors and rich colors, a nice Portland-meets-Bavaria kind of look that I find appealing. The special effects--human-to-creature-face, swarms of untrainable critters like rats and bees, really gruesome dead bodies--are very good.
What's weird is the writing. The stories are...well, okay. Not bad. There are some great action moments. The overarching storyline is intriguing, with secrets, lies, and backstories aplenty--will Nick's wife find out that he's a Grimm? How long will it take for
But the dialog. Dear god. It's as if they have two writer's rooms, where the old hands write the stories, then turn them over to the high school interns to put actual words into the characters' mouths. I honestly don't know how the actors manage, but bless 'em, they do their best.
I'll probably keep watching because, besides the hometown connection, Grimm strikes me as having a lot of potential if NBC gives it a chance. Besides, David Giuntoli, the lead, is the next best thing to Sean Maher runnin' around Portland, and that makes me smile.
Tags:
(no subject)
19/12/11 04:54 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 07:19 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 07:37 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 05:03 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 07:27 (UTC)In some ways it reminds me of early X-Files--I mean, in that there's a poorly-realized but very interesting central premise being paid for with MOTW episodes, and central actors who are still learning how to be leads. I'll give it a few more chances.
And nice to hear from you!
(no subject)
19/12/11 05:24 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 07:28 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 05:50 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 07:29 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 07:40 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 10:05 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 08:54 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 10:03 (UTC)Now if they could shape up the scriptwriting interns from the high school...
(no subject)
19/12/11 10:08 (UTC)I did quite like 'Once Upon A Time', and that's utter tosh, too. Although, I'm many, many episodes behind on that one...
(no subject)
19/12/11 23:33 (UTC)Penetrating to the parts and connections takes me a very, very long time. I don't easily pick out different instruments in a musical arrangement (it's a whole song), or individual spices in a sauce (it's Sauce, not a set of ingredients) or logical flaws in a narrative.
I suspect the ability to do those things is a key to your prolific story-finding ability, that vast idea factory in your head.
Anyway, everything you say about Grimm is valid, and I'm sure it's all part of my perception that I'm not in the presence of greatness when I watch the show, but it would have taken me studying the damn thing with intent to fic before I'd have seen any of those flaws specifically.
(no subject)
20/12/11 00:06 (UTC)I don't think that this is a failure of perception on your part; not in the slightest. Rather, it's an indication of optimism, which I sort of envy. I'm a critical bugger, lol.
(no subject)
20/12/11 00:24 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 23:34 (UTC)(no subject)
19/12/11 23:48 (UTC)(no subject)
20/12/11 00:19 (UTC)But I am enjoying the Portland locations and the craftsmen houses are lovely *G*
Chris Downey, IIRC, confirmed at Con1 that they will be using Portland as the home base for the Leverage team for next year instead of making it pretend to be Boston. I hope it means we get to see more, as you say, Portland-y locations.
(no subject)
20/12/11 00:23 (UTC)(no subject)
20/12/11 03:26 (UTC)(no subject)
20/12/11 04:24 (UTC)I love your Cthulhu icon.
(no subject)
20/12/11 23:59 (UTC)It is kind of odd how uneven the writing is. And the acting, frankly. The acting isn't bad, exactly, but I think the lead is stiff (not helped by the dialogue, as you point out) and with the exception of the werewolf guy (well, and occasionally the lead's cop partner), the characters aren't very compelling.
That said, it's fun and fluffy and somewhat entertaining (as long as you check your brain at the door), with some real potential if thing coalesce a little more. And it seems to be doing well enough -- I read not too long ago that it's NBC's #1 new show and regularly beats Fringe (which is unfortunate, since I really like Fringe and would like to see it get another season). They must have some confidence in it since they granted them a full season fairly early on and they tested it out on Thursday night a couple of weeks ago.
(no subject)
21/12/11 00:49 (UTC)As I mentioned to
Besides the werewolf guy, I think what made me take the show somewhat seriously from the get-go was the compelling character of the dying aunt. Can't say I understood or believed much about the whole random-inheriting-of-Grimmness idea, but her delivery of the Airstream trailer-o-secrets and her subsequent very dark and yet kick-ass death made me think that someone behind the show meant business.
Yeah, I'll give it another chance. But I'd be sorry if it actually kicked Fringe off the air. I LOVE Fringe!
(no subject)
28/12/11 17:19 (UTC)(no subject)
28/12/11 18:51 (UTC)