Clutterhack
27/12/10 08:51![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A comment from
karen_jk this morning has me thinking again about the analogies between weight loss and decluttering--specifically, can you "hack" your clutter the way John Walker claims you can hack your weight?
Looking back at my own massive decluttering project, I see a bunch of similarities between it and Walker's weight-loss story.
I see now that my solution to clutter was similar to Walker's weight hack in several important respects. I had to quantify the problem and design "negative feedback proportional controls" to get to a solution. That meant measuring my initial level of clutter, defining the desired level, and then decreasing the current level systematically and measurably. When the measurement declined, I was on the right track. When it went up, I had to apply additional controls.
The big difference is that with weight loss I only need to control the inputs--how much I eat--and my metabolism will manage the outputs--excess pounds (exercise is a minor factor in calorie burn for me); whereas with decluttering I had to take conscious physical action on both sides of the equation.
The decluttered areas of my house have remained persistently decluttered, but I'm not sure whether that's from a profound and permanent change in my perspective or because I've developed a set of feedback loops and controls that are unconscious. A little of each, I think. I do not think a change of perspective will result in permanent weight-management, but I think it will help me accept that I must fire up the artificial controls pretty much every day forever.
So yeah, I'd say there's a clutterhack, and now I'm curious to design it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Looking back at my own massive decluttering project, I see a bunch of similarities between it and Walker's weight-loss story.
- Body::House
- Excess weight::Clutter
- Goal weight::Uncluttered house
- Calories::Possessions
- Eating::Acquisition
- Calorie Burn::Disposal
I see now that my solution to clutter was similar to Walker's weight hack in several important respects. I had to quantify the problem and design "negative feedback proportional controls" to get to a solution. That meant measuring my initial level of clutter, defining the desired level, and then decreasing the current level systematically and measurably. When the measurement declined, I was on the right track. When it went up, I had to apply additional controls.
The big difference is that with weight loss I only need to control the inputs--how much I eat--and my metabolism will manage the outputs--excess pounds (exercise is a minor factor in calorie burn for me); whereas with decluttering I had to take conscious physical action on both sides of the equation.
The decluttered areas of my house have remained persistently decluttered, but I'm not sure whether that's from a profound and permanent change in my perspective or because I've developed a set of feedback loops and controls that are unconscious. A little of each, I think. I do not think a change of perspective will result in permanent weight-management, but I think it will help me accept that I must fire up the artificial controls pretty much every day forever.
So yeah, I'd say there's a clutterhack, and now I'm curious to design it.
Tags:
(no subject)
27/12/10 22:22 (UTC)(no subject)
27/12/10 22:28 (UTC)I admit, it's not a problem that came into the equation for me, but I've watched my sister make significant strides over time with household rules, easy storage systems, and kind of a steady pressure against the mess-inertia that has driven it back bit by bit.
It's fair to say, though, that the moving out of her eldest and most heedlessly sloppy child probably made the biggest difference.
(no subject)
27/12/10 22:54 (UTC)(no subject)
27/12/10 23:12 (UTC)Speaking for myself, the house decluttering was a major reality-based act, a removing of the scales from my eyes, so to speak: getting out of denial and looking at the problem, face-on. Absolutely nothing came of addressing psychological and emotional causes, and I finally got down to action, plain and simple.
There are a lot of similarities, and I do think that accomplishing the one has opened the way to the other. It's early yet to say much about the latest project, but if there really is a connection from the last one to this one, then I have a lot of hope for success.
Thanks for mentioning it. This really is a revelation!
(no subject)
27/12/10 23:01 (UTC)You were saying that you took pics of the clutter before and after. Did you post them? I'm so terribly ashamed of my clutter piles that I'd find it hard to post them. There's so much shame involved here.
It helps me a lot that you've gone through this process and are sending supportive thoughts my way. :)
(no subject)
27/12/10 23:23 (UTC)Yes, I posted quite a few before-and-afters in my Project Empty posts. You might want to page back to about Skip+40 to get to the early posts where most of the photos are. It was surprisingly liberating to take those pictures, and even more so to post them. The shame became fuel then, because I was extremely eager to post "after" pictures. (Use the tools you've got, right?)
I am so tired of the shame I feel about my weight that though it wasn't my primary conscious motivation for starting the Hacker's Diet, the prospect of not having it anymore has been a huge motivator. Sadly, a politically-based refusal to feel shame was not an avenue that was open to me. The Fat Acceptance movement, while having some value, was not more powerful than my personal shame, and the relief I've felt at walking away from it and towards actually losing the weight has been tremendous.
Shame is terribly toxic and has eaten a huge chunk of my life. I'm reclaiming what's left. Posting photos of my junk piles (with, mind you, intent to demolish them) was a significant step towards abating that hazardous material.
(no subject)
27/12/10 23:22 (UTC)(no subject)
28/12/10 01:16 (UTC)(no subject)
28/12/10 05:07 (UTC)Limiting what was coming in was as important as getting rid of what was already there. I decided that I'd rather risk missing something or even being overcharged on a bill, than have papers in a pile anywhere in my house.
But I'll say this: an intractable and recurring source of clutter like the papers you describe may not be a good starting point. Solutions for that problem might occur to you as you go through more "fossilized" messes and create more lasting empty spaces. I think the experts say to at least put a basket or an in-box out, and make sure all papers at least wind up in that one, contained place if you really can't just recycle them.
(no subject)
28/12/10 08:04 (UTC)On the other hand, I think de-cluttering and weight loss do have a link.
(no subject)
28/12/10 08:09 (UTC)The more I've thought about this matter all day long, the more convinced I'm becoming of a strong link between the two issues.