Recouping: Diet Day 437
27/12/11 17:09![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is the first time I've lost this much weight, the first time I've made a regular habit tracking both my daily weight and my daily food. It's the first time I've ever deliberately pushed the pause button on a diet, and definitely the first time I've ever re-started a diet after stopping (but before regaining all-and-then-some of the weight I'd lost).
After a hiatus of several weeks, it feels good--comfortable and safe--to get back to tracking what I eat. I can envision a time when it'll be enough to do that intermittently, say one week out of the month, but that time isn't yet. I still need that tool.
I haven't quite turned the weight trend line downward again. It takes a couple of weeks for any consistent calorie change to show up there. That's true in either direction, which must account for that magical thinking at the end of a diet that says, "Hey, look! I can now eat all I want and not gain weight." Because for two weeks or so, that's true. The metabolic train doesn't stop on a dime.
Once it does slow down, there are a few weeks where the re-gain is deniable. Then there'll be a couple more weeks where you can't really deny it, but you're not ready to stop it. Then two more once you finally re-take control, and two more after that before the undeniable gain starts to go away again...
The moral of the story, for me, is this: it's easier to stay on the diet than to get back on it, and easier to get back on it sooner rather than later.
I want to remember that.
After a hiatus of several weeks, it feels good--comfortable and safe--to get back to tracking what I eat. I can envision a time when it'll be enough to do that intermittently, say one week out of the month, but that time isn't yet. I still need that tool.
I haven't quite turned the weight trend line downward again. It takes a couple of weeks for any consistent calorie change to show up there. That's true in either direction, which must account for that magical thinking at the end of a diet that says, "Hey, look! I can now eat all I want and not gain weight." Because for two weeks or so, that's true. The metabolic train doesn't stop on a dime.
Once it does slow down, there are a few weeks where the re-gain is deniable. Then there'll be a couple more weeks where you can't really deny it, but you're not ready to stop it. Then two more once you finally re-take control, and two more after that before the undeniable gain starts to go away again...
The moral of the story, for me, is this: it's easier to stay on the diet than to get back on it, and easier to get back on it sooner rather than later.
I want to remember that.
Tags:
(no subject)
28/12/11 17:24 (UTC)Then, of course, I get to work to take the 5lb off again. But all of the time, including during the weight gain, I've been in control, so I don't feel panicky or as though it's all doomed now that I've put a bit extra back on.
(no subject)
28/12/11 18:47 (UTC)The Hacker's Diet agrees with you that a band of a couple of pounds on either side of your nominal goal weight is a good strategy. He gives a five-pound band (2.5 lbs on either side) as a normal range of fluctuation, and a ten-pound band as an alarm trigger. He suggests that in any given month your weight trend might wander around in that narrower band because of water weight, but if the trend line hits the wider limit, immediate diet changes are in order.
Conscious awareness has certainly been the key to my success so far. It sounds like it's been yours, too.
(no subject)
29/12/11 22:10 (UTC)(no subject)
28/12/11 18:35 (UTC)The Hacker's Diet is about taking the emotion out of dieting and that seems to be one of its great strengths.
Sorry I haven't been commenting much! I read all your entries.
(no subject)
28/12/11 19:02 (UTC)Taking the emotion out of dieting really does seem to be the only way--at least, for me. One good thing about the approach is that it frees up emotion for other parts of life where it does more good. :D