The last paid holiday
25/12/13 19:09![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Today is the last paid holiday of my career.
Though it's true that Americans don't take much time off compared to, say, Europeans, I'm still very cognizant of the generous plan my public sector place of employment has given me all these years; how many days they've paid me not to be at work.
From the very outset, when I was a just a wee Word Processing Clerk I (anyone remember those?), they gave me ten days of vacation, twelve of sick leave, and three personal days per year.
The vacation-day count has gone up along with the workload, so that when I turn in my badge next week, they're going to pay me for all the vacation I haven't actually managed to take for the last several years. That drop in the retirement bucket will make an audible splash, I can tell you.
As to sick leave...well, I learned an important lesson in my early days. A woman I worked with was singled out for praise because she had never taken a single sick day in, I forget, something like three years. Her reward? A free day off. It was obvious to me that she could have skipped the praise and had twelve paid days off in each of those years.
(Also, praising someone for the "virtue" of naturally good health is, at the very least, annoying.)
In short, I've never been afraid to "call in well" when I needed a mental health day. I'm pretty sure that's why a) I never climbed higher in the organization and b) the benefits of retiring at the first possible moment outweigh the big pay cut I'm about to take.
Besides, they don't buy back your unused sick leave. I'd've been dumb not to use it.
Back to work tomorrow for a few more days of toil in the fields of the System.
Though it's true that Americans don't take much time off compared to, say, Europeans, I'm still very cognizant of the generous plan my public sector place of employment has given me all these years; how many days they've paid me not to be at work.
From the very outset, when I was a just a wee Word Processing Clerk I (anyone remember those?), they gave me ten days of vacation, twelve of sick leave, and three personal days per year.
The vacation-day count has gone up along with the workload, so that when I turn in my badge next week, they're going to pay me for all the vacation I haven't actually managed to take for the last several years. That drop in the retirement bucket will make an audible splash, I can tell you.
As to sick leave...well, I learned an important lesson in my early days. A woman I worked with was singled out for praise because she had never taken a single sick day in, I forget, something like three years. Her reward? A free day off. It was obvious to me that she could have skipped the praise and had twelve paid days off in each of those years.
(Also, praising someone for the "virtue" of naturally good health is, at the very least, annoying.)
In short, I've never been afraid to "call in well" when I needed a mental health day. I'm pretty sure that's why a) I never climbed higher in the organization and b) the benefits of retiring at the first possible moment outweigh the big pay cut I'm about to take.
Besides, they don't buy back your unused sick leave. I'd've been dumb not to use it.
Back to work tomorrow for a few more days of toil in the fields of the System.
(no subject)
26/12/13 08:12 (UTC)As one of those Europeans, the concept of a sick day allocation is pretty baffling. We call in sick when we're sick (with documentation from doctor if it's longer than a couple of days) and get paid by either the employer or, if it's longer term, the state. As a government employee, abrinsky received full pay for his 3 months off pre/post back surgery last year.
Not only do we get a far more generous holiday allowance than you do but there is a general principle of making people use the full allocation, discouraging payment in lieu or carrying over. That someone doesn't take their holidays is considered a flag for possible fraud/embezzlement (because they fear discovery).
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:01 (UTC)different gah!differed on one essential point: in the US, labor agitated for more pay. In Europe, the emphasis was on time off. (This related to his main topic, as I recall, because the American standard resulted in a need for convenience foods.)Of course, the American labor movement just reflected the already-existent American ethos: that wealth is paramount and that long, hard hours of work, while in no way guaranteeing wealth, are at least a necessary prerequisite, and character building.
Or some such bullshit. The degree to which I feel guilty and apologetic about being able to retire is a pretty accurate gauge of my culture's pervasive beliefs about work, money, and worth. Somehow, I'm going to soldier through it and retire anyway.
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:17 (UTC)Of course, we have many dreadful things going on in our labour market at the moment, such as a minimum wage below that is less than the living wage, and the sudden proliferation of 'zero hours' contracts, but these are - I hope - aberrations.
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:30 (UTC)(no subject)
26/12/13 21:15 (UTC)In the US, we have FMLA (Family & Medical Leave Act), which means that in a workplace with more than 50 employees (i.e., doesn't apply in smaller workplaces, which is most of them) a worker can take up to 3 months of unpaid leave for a qualifying family or medical issue (maternity leave, adoption, medical problem, or care of a sick relative) without losing their job.
That's about one notch above Scrooge on the Miserly Treatment of Workers Scale, yet American employers get the vapors at the very notion of FMLA. The idea of paying people for that time, even if indirectly via the state, would bring on the full wailing and gnashing of teeth. You never saw a more hysteria-prone bunch than the American business sector.
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:33 (UTC)Statutory maternity leave is up to 52 weeks. Minimum is 2 weeks, 4 if you work in a factory.
And the US response to anything like this, and socialised health care in particular, is beyond my comprehension.
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:50 (UTC)The book Quiet by Susan Cain was provocative in suggesting that the American corporate culture of today was created largely by Harvard Business School's stated standard since the 1950s of admitting only extroverts. We're the most extroverted population in the world--apparently by a wide margin--and creating a whole cadre of ultra-powerful business leaders without regard to introvert-type values probably made sense to those people. It resulted, Cain suggests, in the incredible arrogance that caused the crash of 2008.
It's certainly a sensational claim, and subject to all kinds of argument, but it feels right to me and gave me a surprising degree of the "ah-ha!" relief that comes from at least having the puzzle pieces slot into place, however unsatisfactory the resulting picture is.
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:55 (UTC)I'm enjoying this conversation--hope you don't mind!
26/12/13 22:26 (UTC)If you accept that introversion and extraversion are evolved characteristics, heritable and genetic (which there's at least some evidence for), you could make a case that the United States is a kind of Polynesia for extraversion: coming here would have tended to be a choice made by extroverts (Explore! conquer! evade gaming debts! get land! say fuck you to the Church! Whatever!) So we wind up with a population--and therefore a whole culture--heavily weighted towards extraversion, with all the good and bad that that entails.
A great deal of the self-improvement/self-help mania in this country is, essentially, aimed at showing introverts how to be extraverts. I've been delighted to see so much discussion in the last couple of years that gives introversion its due. A quick glance at online articles on the subject, however, shows a discouraging number of "you're not really an introvert" headlines, and "here's how to fix that," and "introversion isn't a real thing" and "you probably don't know what you're talking about."
Sigh.
(no subject)
26/12/13 22:00 (UTC)Naturally, I'm going to drag my ass in to work if I'm even half-alive, and spread my sickness far and wide. Seriously, one of the main reasons people balk at using mass transit in this country is that it is used by sick workers who can't afford cars or time off, and hence city buses are germ-aganzas in the winter months. (And I'll admit that I've had fewer colds since I started bike commuting.)
OMG Don't get me started. Whoops. Too late.
(no subject)
26/12/13 15:34 (UTC)(no subject)
26/12/13 21:03 (UTC)Me neither. Well, it's practically here. Nobody's working much this week or next and I'm just puttering around, cleaning up my desk and finishing a few last things.
(no subject)
26/12/13 17:31 (UTC)(no subject)
26/12/13 21:07 (UTC)Anyway, thank you! I'm excited too.
(no subject)
27/12/13 16:19 (UTC)(no subject)
26/12/13 20:56 (UTC)Good for you for getting that important lesson about sick leave, by the way. That is absolutely how I think it should be used, and I encourage others (coworkers, friends, etc.) to treat it that way whenever the subject comes up. Unfortunately, it's a case of do as I say, not as I do. :( I used to be better about taking mental health days instead of leaving sick leave on the table before I was promoted, but I'm hyperaware of how much disruption my absence causes for the people around me (which isn't to say that I'm a hugely important cog, because I'm not). And with the added vacation, I admit I feel too guilty most of the time to also take sick leave unless I'm actually sick. Score another point for the insidious and toxic corporate culture of America.
(no subject)
26/12/13 21:25 (UTC)We top out at three weeks' vacation per year, too, but we can accumulate up to nine weeks. After that we lose it--they simply erase any excess over 360 hours on January 1. This bucket size of 360 hours probably originated with the intention of getting workaholics down off their workaholic horses for everyone's good. But the practical outcome is that it gets harder and harder to find time to take the vacation, and even here, there's a subtle (sometimes not-so-subtle) message that you're a better team player if you just don't use much of it--and certainly never all three weeks at once.
This is how I've wound up with nine weeks of unused vacation on the books that, as of January 1, will be paid into my deferred comp account. It's not as insidious and toxic as the corporate model, but it's gotten progressively less benign over my career. The corporate model tail wags the government dog...just kind of slowly, with a ten year time lag.
That revolution can't come soon enough, but I suspect it's not going to look like a revolution. The metaphor that springs to mind is little green shoots coming up out the ash-field of Mt St Helens in 1981.