darkemeralds: An old book whose spine reads Signsls and Cyphers, with the text DarkEmeralds (Cyphers)
[personal profile] darkemeralds
I've just finished listening to the audiobook version of Julie Sondra Decker's The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality (narrated by Reay Kaplan).

I book-reviewed it on Audible, but I wanted to make a few notes about my more personal reaction to it.



When I first encountered the idea of asexuality, I thought, "That could be me, but I'm not sure it fits," and I spent some time on AVEN forums, trying to figure out if I "qualified" to claim the label. I didn't feel especially at home in those forums, being about three times the age of the average user and having very little in common with most of them. I had some serious problems trying to fit my sexual history into a model that is still being defined and that didn't exist until I was already 50 years old.

So I wandered off, and have intermittently (and in safe spaces) identified as "ace" or "on the spectrum" without being out about it. Out-ness feels either unimportant or dangerous to me for various reasons having to do with my age and my family. In the meantime, I explored a lot of my other atypicalities: lefthandedness, attachment "disorder", introversion (atypical mostly only by American standards), permanent singlehood, an attention deficit; some of which feel akin to my asexuality for reasons I can't quite articulate.

Then, the other evening, I stumbled on a documentary called (A)Sexual on Netflix, and that led me to Julie Decker's new book, where, at last, I found specific acknowledgment that people my age, without a term or concept to describe themselves, might have a sexual history very much like mine and might feel just as I feel about it, and yes, do therefore claim the asexual descriptor.

For instance, I've been in sexual relationships. Sex was not horrible: I enjoyed some of it. I find some people aesthetically attractive, but I never had a way to understand the difference between that and sexual attraction. For most of my adult life, I thought they were synonymous, and I've found plenty of men visually pleasing. I have a libido--admittedly, not a huge one--and OMG I've written sexually explicit stories! That disqualifies me, right?

And then there's the fact that I have had some kind-of traumatic experiences around men and sex, and I've been diagnosed and treated for depression, AND I'm getting pretty old--so maybe "that's all it is": just PTSD, just mental illness, just age. Does all this mean I can't really claim the asexual label? The Invisible Orientation cleared that up: many asexual people have the same experiences. Asexuality is a description for people who aren't sexually attracted to others. It's mine to use if I want to.

I've come away from the book feeling much more sure (and positive) about calling myself asexual: somewhere in the nuanced and complex set of terms for self-concepts outside the "allosexual" (that is, non-asexual) range is one that fits me. Did it fit me every single day of my life? No. It's not a perfect match for my whole history. But I'm now willing to consider that the preponderance of evidence supports my decision to identity as ace.

It's pretty liberating.
Tags:

(no subject)

9/10/14 07:04 (UTC)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] azurelunatic
It is delightful to hear about you finding your truths.

(no subject)

9/10/14 15:34 (UTC)
cookiemom6067: (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] cookiemom6067
It's interesting to me that I'm hearing from younger people that, " I just don't like labels." Raven Symone, pretty conspicuously this week, plus a niece of mine in the same age range a couple of days ago, while some of us look to label ourselves. I'm not sure it's necessarily a generational thing, or if it's a good, bad, or indifferent thing. It's just a thing I just noticed.

(no subject)

9/10/14 17:33 (UTC)
pinesandmaples: Half a brown coconut. (theme: half shell)
Posted by [personal profile] pinesandmaples
Does the book also talk about things like demi/gray-A sexuality?

(no subject)

10/10/14 01:53 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] swankivy.livejournal.com
Hey! I don't usually reply to reviews because, you know, professionalism, and people are supposed to be able to have their say without the author butting in, but I saw in your Audible review that you posed a question to me in case I am reading, and I'd love to answer it!

Oddly enough, I didn't have any involvement with the audio book so I didn't know the narrator was going to make an attempt at reading the resources section, and one of my issues with the audio format was that when she read the quote boxes from other asexual people, you didn't know it was designed to be an aside until she read out the attribution, and then you didn't know where the contributed text started! I wish she'd said "begin quote" or something. Those were little shaded gray boxes in the print version. She mispronounced quite a few of the blog names and handles, too, but it's forgivable; I just wish I could have guided that somewhat.

Anyway, you asked about resources! My website has some. It's not designed in the same order as the book's resources, but everything I mentioned in that chapter is probably in here somewhere:

http://juliesondradecker.com/?page_id=2058

I hope this helps! Thanks for reading/listening.

(no subject)

10/10/14 03:31 (UTC)
firecat: damiel from wings of desire tasting blood on his fingers. text "i has a flavor!" (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] firecat
At 52 I can relate to a lot of what you say about not feeling at home among the majority age demographic of people exploring these labels. The book sounds very good.

(no subject)

10/10/14 23:59 (UTC)
lyr: (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] lyr
I'm glad it's been a liberating experience! I felt much the same way about finding the label demisexual. All my life before that, I had no word for it and so felt very singular and solitary about the way I experience sexuality. I like having the word, even if I still have to explain it to most people.

(no subject)

18/10/14 19:26 (UTC)
writerscramp: stranger than fiction (emma thompson, i luv u) (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] writerscramp
Thanks for sharing such a personal piece of your journey and your own reflections about this newly-acquired knowledge. It's not your job to educate me, obviously, but I appreciate the opportunity to learn a little bit about your experience and to expand my understanding.

Recognizing yourself in a description or a label, finding that sense of belonging, having that moment of "this is me!"...these are so important to validation of our identity. We all want to be known (as in being seen, understood, etc.), to have our identity and experiences validated. One of the problems of privilege is that it excludes those who don't fit in those privileged groups from being known. They miss out on that very valuable affirmation.

I'm glad that you've found something that speaks to this piece of your identity -- perhaps not completely, perhaps not quite in the "aha!" way that it might for others, but at least in some way that you recognize your reflection. Everyone deserves to see their reflection in the world around them.

(no subject)

15/1/15 00:39 (UTC)
tehomet: (Fat happy unicorn rainbow love)
Posted by [personal profile] tehomet
Thank you for this fascinating post. Good for you that you've found a descriptor that is a better fit and is empowering. Everyone deserves that and I hope it becomes a more frequent experience in our culture. Truth and beauty!

Profile

darkemeralds: A round magical sigil of mysterious meaning, in bright colors with black outlines. A pen nib is suggested by the intersection of the cryptic forms. (Default)
darkemeralds

May 2024

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19 2021 222324 25
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page generated 6/6/25 01:09

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags