Masterwork Experiment
23/3/20 09:49![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
darkemeraldsI'm writing a new story.
It began as an experiment. Shawn Coyne, my editing mentor, wanted to find out whether an accomplished writer (me) could create a fresh story by borrowing the deep structure of a masterwork, but changing the setting.
If I could, he would publish it.
The masterwork he chose was Annie Proulx's "Brokeback Mountain," and my task was to transpose it to Regency England.
The experiment was a success in that it did inspire me to start a new story, something I haven't been able to do for more than three years.
It was a failure, however, in that all Shawn's rules blocked me for almost nine months, and I wasn't able to break the blockage till I broke most of the rules.
Once I finally let my story diverge--from "Brokeback," from Shawn's idea of its meaning, from the scenes I'd written in the first days of the experiment, and at last, from the experiment itself--it was no longer the thing Shawn wanted. Which means Story Grid probably won't publish it.
It is the story of two lower-class men (servants) who meet on the job and fall in love. But that's where the "Brokeback" scaffolding ends. I'm changing everything else. Above all, I am not going to kill one of them. I don't think we need any more buried gays.
Instead I borrowed other stories' scaffolding: the devoted but deluded servant in The Remains of the Day. The relationship dynamic from The Untamed. Part of the ending of The Song of Achilles.
And the true-life history of Matthew Tomlinson whose 1810 diaries were recently uncovered.
I'm submitting the first act of this no-longer-anything-like-Brokeback story to a writing partner in a couple of days, and we'll see how it goes.
It began as an experiment. Shawn Coyne, my editing mentor, wanted to find out whether an accomplished writer (me) could create a fresh story by borrowing the deep structure of a masterwork, but changing the setting.
If I could, he would publish it.
The masterwork he chose was Annie Proulx's "Brokeback Mountain," and my task was to transpose it to Regency England.
The experiment was a success in that it did inspire me to start a new story, something I haven't been able to do for more than three years.
It was a failure, however, in that all Shawn's rules blocked me for almost nine months, and I wasn't able to break the blockage till I broke most of the rules.
Once I finally let my story diverge--from "Brokeback," from Shawn's idea of its meaning, from the scenes I'd written in the first days of the experiment, and at last, from the experiment itself--it was no longer the thing Shawn wanted. Which means Story Grid probably won't publish it.
It is the story of two lower-class men (servants) who meet on the job and fall in love. But that's where the "Brokeback" scaffolding ends. I'm changing everything else. Above all, I am not going to kill one of them. I don't think we need any more buried gays.
Instead I borrowed other stories' scaffolding: the devoted but deluded servant in The Remains of the Day. The relationship dynamic from The Untamed. Part of the ending of The Song of Achilles.
And the true-life history of Matthew Tomlinson whose 1810 diaries were recently uncovered.
I'm submitting the first act of this no-longer-anything-like-Brokeback story to a writing partner in a couple of days, and we'll see how it goes.
(no subject)
24/3/20 01:43 (UTC)True fact - I got into fanfiction way back in the early 90s because i was *so tired* of all the profic with same sex couples that were dark, depressing, hopeless, and usually ended in someone dying. Fanfic had actual love and sex and happy endings!
Your story sounds pretty interesting - something I'd definitely read. :D
(no subject)
24/3/20 01:51 (UTC)My own entry into fanfic was on a much less conscious path. For years, I couldn't articulate my (often guilty) attraction to it, most of which was slash.
I was interviewed on the Big Gay Fiction Podcast a while back, and they asked me why I write M/M. By then I was able to explain that as an outsider to heterosexuality myself, I find solace in depictions of queer relationships, and as an asexual person I like those relationships to be away from bodies like mine, if that makes sense.
It still doesn't make a lot of sense to me, frankly, but I sounded good on the podcast!
(no subject)
24/3/20 01:55 (UTC)Honestly, it makes sense. I'm not asexual, but - I don't really like to be touched, and i don't like or want sex probably 99% of the time. I find it just...uncomfortable to watch heterosexual (or lesbian) sex scenes (or read them), because, I guess, it's assumed i'll be interested, turned on, want to do that, whatever.
M/M sex puts no expectations on me of any kind, so it's much more freeing, interesting and...a turn on. Which i guess might be weird? WHO KNOWS.
I know i was slashing book characters for years before I even found same-sex books (I think the first time ever was Colin/Dickon in The Secret Garden).
(no subject)
24/3/20 02:02 (UTC)That's brilliant. Despite many problematic elements inherent in her century-old novels, she's a storytelling idol of mine. I've read several of her lesser-known works, and I'm, like, an expert on A Little Princess, which I adore. Though it is sadly short of boy characters and I've never been much for femmeslash.
The more I'm open about my asexuality (I really need an icon--I'll use my Sherlock one for now), the more I hear accounts like yours, which make me think the sexuality spectrum isn't NEARLY as weighted towards the Hollywood horny-het middle as Harvey Weinstein would have had us believe all those years.
Your description of your own relationship to M/M is just about perfect, including "Which I guess might be weird? WHO KNOWS." That, exactly.
(no subject)
24/3/20 02:16 (UTC)*twirls you*
YES! Secret Garden and A Little Princess were and are favorites - i've read and read and read them - still do!
Oh, man - Weinstein et al's 'vision' of women, men, and sexuality is so skewed, so forced, so *boring*. OMG. I think that's the biggest factor there. It's DULL. Predictable, cliched and tropey in all the worst ways.
I think the more open we are, the easier it is to figure out just *who* we are, and what we like.
(no subject)
24/3/20 02:58 (UTC)(no subject)
24/3/20 03:08 (UTC)(no subject)
24/3/20 04:02 (UTC)